Why was I so quick to condemn the Geithner plan? Because it’s not new; it’s just another version of an idea that keeps coming up and keeps being refuted. It’s basically a thinly disguised version of the same plan Henry Paulson announced way back in September.
This seems to be a common theme among those not liking the plan; it is too much like the Paulson plan.
I might be wrong on this, but I seem to remember Paulson bailing on his plan. Instead of buying up the crappy assests didn't Paulson simply try to inject more capital into the banks? So while this plan is similar to Paulson's, it wasn't really tried was it?
And since stuff like this is pretty boring...
No comments:
Post a Comment